Barcelona 22@ Office × Institutional investor
MATCH-019003246bd6ffa8a63ac986 · rank #10
This pair is ineligible — at least one hard filter failed. See the audit trail below.
Soft score breakdown
- Geography
- 50
- Sector
- 85
- Ticket fit
- 8
- Risk alignment
- 0
- ESG alignment
- 0
- Geo signals
- 80
- Pricing attractiveness
- 71
- Liquidity
- 75
Hard filters
- jurisdiction.in_preferences
- PASS
- ticket.in_range
- PASS
- mandate.sfdr_compatible
- FAIL
- mifid.risk_within_tolerance
- FAIL
- lockup.within_max
- PASS
- esg.floor_and_exclusions
- FAIL
Why this matches
axis.sector.pro
+0.14
sector aligns with investor preference profile
axis.geo_signals.pro
+0.10
CZ-GEO-SIGNALS-v1 composite is strong for this asset
axis.pricing_attractiveness.pro
+0.06
DP V3 Bayesian posterior flags attractive entry pricing
Risks & concerns
hard.mandate.sfdr_compatible
−1.00
investor mandate art_9 NOT satisfied by asset art_6
hard.mifid.risk_within_tolerance
−1.00
asset SRRI 4 vs investor tolerance 3
hard.esg.floor_and_exclusions
−1.00
ESG composite 60.0, sector office, vs investor thresholds
Audit trail
- algorithm
- cz-matching-v1.0.0
- generated_at
- 2024-01-01T00:00:00+00:00
- reproducibility_hash
- 019003246bd6ffa8a63ac9863ac549502fae12091bb4ffc59e5498e5e4a9e79d
Same inputs → same score → same hash. Re-runnable for regulator audit on day 1 and day 1000.